sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand
About

“Why aren’t there any men in your story?” It’s the question I get most about “Sweet Sixteen” (Lightspeed, July 2011). Whether I say this in my answer or not depends on the context of the question, but my immediate response is always to wonder whether the person asking the question would have noticed if I had written a story in which there were no women.

***

I write speculative fiction because for me, that is the literature of possibility. Oh, sure, to do it well, you need to be concerned about making the strangeness of your story believable to the reader. The science shouldn’t contain any howlers. The magic should have an internal logic. But if you want to make a tiny blonde cheerleader the biggest demon-slaying badass around, good on you.

Although, I’ve noticed that for some people, it’s not the demons that are the unbelievable part of that hypothetical story.For them, the thing that is beyond strange is the idea that a woman can do this--be the hero, kill the monster, save herself. That she’s in the story to be more than the Serving Wench™ at the Epic Fantasy Inn™ or the girlfriend or the virginally pure Final Girl of a horror film--you know, the one the hero gets to in time due to her amazing power of never having had sex. Too many people seem perfectly able to imagine an alt-history with wizards, but not an alt-history with women.

***

I discovered that my heart and my home lay in the literature of the fantastic in high school. Perhaps high school, that whirling cauldron of desperation and hormones, is a strange place to embrace one’s inner nerdiness, but it worked for me. I had wonderful teachers, including a Jesuit brother who constantly referred to God in the feminine and assigned Arthur C. Clarke and Frederick Pohl in World History, and an English teacher who taught in fangs after noticing a group of us obsessively passing around Interview With the Vampire. I was never one of the popular kids, but I always had friends, and they were the kind of people who would suggest refilming “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” for fun one summer. I found my people, and I found my voice.

And then I lost it.

I became, through a series of events far too tedious to rehearse here, invisible, even to myself. I wasn’t a nerd or a fantasy geek anymore, I was just a woman-shaped cipher, dressing myself in the skin and clothes that someone else asked me to wear. I suppose if I can manage to disappear myself so completely, I shouldn’t be surprised when literature manages to do the same thing.

***

Except. Except. I write to find myself again. I write because, like so many of us, I have demons to slay. I’ve discovered that--like that tiny blonde cheerleader--I can solve all my problems by sticking them with pointy objects. I just use a pen instead of a stake. And when I write, I can correct for invisibility.

***

“Why aren’t there any men in your story?” Because so often, there aren’t any women in stories, and no one notices that. Or when they do, and they ask, they are supposed to accept a facile answer like “It was a novel about war” and smile and nod understandingly, as if war or great works of literature were solely about men. I refuse to accept this as reality--it is an appalling erasure in works of mimetic fiction, and doubly so in works of speculative fiction.

I write speculative fiction because I want to write stories where we already know that the monster is the metaphor, and that the interesting part is what happens next. I write it because we are monsters too, sometimes, monsters in subtle and lasting ways. I write because no matter how subtle the monster, someone needs to pick up a pointy object and fight it.

Kat Howard's short fiction has appeared in a variety of places, including the anthology Stories, edited by Neil Gaiman and Al Sarrantonio, Fantasy Magazine, and Weird Tales. You can find her on twitter as @KatWithSword.

Marcos said...

"It's a novel about war" reminded me of that excerpt from V.Woolf:

"Speaking crudely, football and sport are ‘important’; the worship of fashion, the buying of clothes ‘trivial’. And these values are inevitably transferred from life to fiction. This is an important book, the critic assumes, because it deals with war. This is an insignificant book because it deals with the feelings of women in a drawing-room."
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/w/woolf/virginia/w91r/chapter4.html

(Only now it struck me that a novel about war MAY be a novel about women in a war.)

And, to quote a contemporary author:
http://dunedinschool.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/joss-whedon-strong-female-characters.jpg

November 9, 2011 9:42 AM
Lady Epsilon said...

Delightful. "Correct for Invisibility" may be my new motto.

November 9, 2011 10:25 PM
Bryan Russell said...

Or, you know, those dude authors who put in female characters only so that they can talk about the sexual prowess of the male characters. Because, you know, that's all women ever talk about on their own.


Correct for invisibility: hear, hear.

November 10, 2011 8:16 AM
JS Bangs said...

I (a man) read your story, and I assure you that I didn't even notice that there were no men. I might have spared a thought to wonder about how reproduction works in this society, but it's not too hard to imagine that they're all just offscreen somewhere. I was more intrigued by the fact that [spoiler!] the protag eventually decides not to be a Tiffany.

November 10, 2011 8:49 AM
Marian Allen said...

Many, many thanks for this post. I was very pleased when one of my fantasies, re-issued last year, lost a star in a review because it didn't seem to make any difference in the story that men and women were equal in it. I was like, that's kind of the point, isn't it?

Beautiful post! And Marcos, thank YOU for the links.

Marian Allen
Fantasies, mysteries, comedies, recipes

November 10, 2011 8:50 AM
Stephanie said...

Wonderful post. I write women's fiction. My stories might be "quieter" than an Epic War Novel or a Man's Journey to Find Himself, but that doesn't make them less important.

November 10, 2011 9:03 AM
Margaret McGriff said...

Yes!! I love this post and totally understand what you're saying! When I initially started my novel I wanted it to be all women and virtually had no men and a critique was that there weren't any men. Then I look at the fantasy stories I read and there aren't any female heroines that stand out. Why is it okay to have a book with a whole bunch of men but not with a bunch of women (unless it's chick lit?).

Now that my book is done and in the editing stages I find it even more important to have woman leads in fantasy and epic fantasy stories.

And you put it best with your final line: "I write because no matter how subtle the monster, someone needs to pick up a pointy object and fight it."

It shouldn't matter the gender of the person holding that point object.

Awesome post!

November 10, 2011 10:48 AM
McFadden said...

"Too many people seem perfectly able to imagine an alt-history with wizards, but not an alt-history with women."

This, so much. I'm always amazed by guys who have no problem with the most bizarre/farfetched flights of imagination in fantasy fiction but can't swallow the idea of a woman being in control of her own life in a pre-industrial setting. Even in a completely fictionalised world.

November 11, 2011 2:50 AM
McFadden said...

Sorry for DP, but I'd rather read a novel with no female characters than one where the female characters are 2D love interests/sex objects

November 11, 2011 2:52 AM
Cara M. said...

This is great. I'm having a similar problem with this my WIP. It's about princesses and ... post-feminism (which distresses me oh so much), and one of the criticisms brought up was 'where are the princes, what about them'? But for me, that wasn't even part of the question. Princes were an ideal, they weren't the issue. The issue was women interacting with women and getting past the rhetoric to the meaningful part.

Of course in the world I had built the princes would be having some problems, and it's important to think about that. But masculinity and the co-optation of liberated sexuality are not something I actually want (or have space) to deal with.

Maybe next time, boys. But for now, get out.

November 11, 2011 7:02 PM
Ellen said...

Hey, Kat! Great article. Thank you for writing it. I myself have always been peeved at how in the mainstream pictures of the far future-- in which we fly in cars and mostly wear silver jumpsuits-- ANYTHING amazing is possible-- but, of course, the women still serve the tea.

November 18, 2011 4:08 PM
Post a Comment