Today's Theatre Review
Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Our charming friend Weston reviews plays for a theatre website. He took us last night as his plus-one (when broke, turn down no free entertainments, says we) to Manhattan Theatresource's Things at the Doorstep, a set of one-man plays billed as "an evening of horror based on the works of H.P. Lovecraft." One knows, straight off the bat, that even if one is a Lovecraft fan (which we are, with reservations), two back-to-back one-man shows based on Lovecraft stories are either going to be truly amazing or staggeringly awful. There is not much room for the middling in such an endeavor. Luckily for us, they turned out to be amazing.
As with most of the truly magical things that have happened to us in New York, we encountered this play by chance. The occasion did seem fortuitous: yesterday was the anniversary of H.P.'s death (of intestinal cancer). That we turned out to be wearing the same shirt as playwright Nat Cassidy was a nice fateful touch (Bauhaus, very appropriate, kind of spooky). Equally apt--particularly for Lovecraft, who was obsessed with astrological omens--the moon is five days away from perigee; on the 19th of March the full moon will be the closest to earth it's been in twenty years. So! all of that, rather portentous indeed. Thus it was quite fitting that Things at the Doorstep turned out to be an unexpectedly brilliant mediation on the use and function of horror, on H.P. Lovecraft himself, on the supernatural, on storytelling, on death, on hope. On acting, which bears a suspicious similarity to writing: a career that is almost entirely out of your control--a series of petty humiliations and ongoing miseries that one endures for the sake of those rare and perfect moments of transcendence, when one crosses over into another world, another body, another story than one's own.
We are still thinking, a day later, about what it means to tell a story, and about what it means to love a writer whose work is difficult and often horrifying--and not in the Stephen King sense of the word, either. As someone who has struggled for years to reconcile her love of, shall we say, problematic texts with her love of a radical and liberatory politics, it is both reassuring and useful to watch someone else wrestling with the same questions--in this case, in the course of a play creepy and magical enough to do old H.P. proud (although it is difficult to imagine that gentleman being pleased with much of anything, to be honest). You did not know, did you, that there were so many lessons to take home, from the life of a man who hated people in general and women and people of color very much in particular; a lonely, nasty, bitter human being who spent the entirety of his life in a state of profound misery, who died alone and penniless and in excruciating pain, having never known a moment of success; and yet, who produced one of the most enduring and influential bodies of work in literary history.
We are not going to spoil the secret of this play for you, except to say that it is the most delightful thing we have ever seen anyone pull off on a stage, anywhere, ever, and if you are in New York you must go see it. You must. You REALLY MUST. Whatever you do, do not leave during the intermission. Things at the Doorstep is playing at Manhattan Theatresource through next weekend. Go. GO. Write and tell us about it, if you do.
Le R.! Sometimes I think we must have been separated at birth. (And then, other times, not.) The relationship one has with Lovecraft's work can indeed be fraught with tension. Even if one could overlook his racism and misogyny (and one can't) the florid prose is often enough to make you wince. But then there's all the Awesome. I wish I could see this production, and since I left the stage myself ten years ago I basically never ever say that.
I have long wanted to write a graphic novel based on Mountains of Madness. You heard that Guillermo del Toro's film adaptation has been scrapped? Right after Tom Cruise was said to be on board to star. Probably for the best--but then who better to star in a film about ancient otherworldly beings seeping down from the stars than a Scientologist?
Dear Le R, This is completely off-topic for H.P. and his world of wondrous horror, but I must commend you for your correct use of "it's". A simple thing. You might say, "pfft, who doesn't know the difference between it's and its?" I have just spent a morning trying to read a book that was sent to me for a review - make that, a glowing review - and I can tell you, some people don't know the difference. And yet they are writers. Just as I was weeping bitter tears for the end of good writing as we know it, you came along to bring me hope. Thank you.
It's been a long time since I've seen something really special on stage. Wish I could go see that.
Isn't it always the case that the most amazing experiences are the ones you go into thinking they might be very, very terrible? There is probably some cause and effect involved with that.
Holy shit, dude, thanks so much for the lovely words about the show. I'm doubly grateful because not only am I so glad you enjoyed the show but also because Great God Google brought me to this blog, the archives of which I'm now obsessively poring over on account of its awesomeness. Seriously, I am in blog-heaven. To coin the phrase.
Just a few points of fact on this review and the Houellebecq one:
Lovecraft was not socially inept nor a shut-in. He had a wide network of friends whom he travelled widely to visit. His "occasional correspondence" to friends and fans actually amounted to --no exaggeration-- approximately 100,000 letters over the course of his life.
And he was far from terminally unhappy, although he certainly endured --and created-- his own share of misery.
Also, his aversion to a "fishy smell" was due to a lifelong allergy to fish.
Definitely check out "H. P. Lovecraft: A Life" by S. T. Joshi (Necronomicon Press, 1996) the definitive biography of HPL. Lengthy and dense, but far more comprehensive and level-headed than virtually every other look at his life, work, and legacy.
http://www.amazon.com/H-P-Lovecraft-S-T-Joshi/dp/0940884887
Went to see this based on your recommendation, as I don't know a lick of Lovecraft, and had a great time! Both shows were very well-done and mind-blowing, each in its own way. Thanks for the tip! Cthulhu says hi.
Hey Ms. R,
I'm writing from the future! Bleepborpbip!
I just wanted to say thanks again for your lovely consideration of our wacky Lovecraft play. I thought you might be happy to hear it's currently nominated for a 2011 NY Innovative Theatre Award for Outstanding Solo Performance - hugely gratifying and due in no small part to amazingly wonderful folks like you (and your readers) who helped get the word out.
I also, by way of thanks, wanted to invite you to my next show (currently running at La MaMa) and our big ol' celebratory bash at the Russian Tea Room. This is the only way I know to get in touch with you, so I hope this doesn't look spammy, but there are show dates and contact info on our official website (eternalhusband[dot]info), so if you'd like to come, head that way and we will gladly set you up with tickets.
It's a 75 minute private detective noir ghost story, loosely based on a Dostoevsky novella. So, y'know, good times.
Thanks again, dear R'shonist. I hope all's well on your side of the world wide webbing.
Post a Comment