Special Guest Post: Chérie l'Ecrivain On Coincidences
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Chérie looks for meaning everywhere. I am a lapsed Catholic, and a childhood spent in catechism being told that a bearded man in the sky was monitoring my thoughts has turned me into an irrationally superstitious adult who has spent the last decade or so trying to shake the feeling that the universe is maybe a little cognizant. The other day I ran into my best friend and her husband on the subway platform one stop away from Coney Island--we had independently undertaken spontaneous trips to the beach, I got off the train early because a virulent shouting match had erupted in my subway car, and my friends did the same because they wanted to take a stroll down the boardwalk before laying out their blankets. It was hard not to think that cosmic orchestration played a part in what turned out to be the single best day of my summer, which I spent eating hot dogs, swimming in the Atlantic, and riding the Wonder Wheel with literally my two favorite people [ in addition to the Rejectionist --ed.] in the world.
Later that week, the Times ran a blog explaining that coincidences like this are actually very common. In simple terms: every day, the sheer number of possible events that COULD occur and be perceived by us as an extraordinary "coincidence" is so enormous that these moments of "holy shit, what are the chances" are bound to happen sooner or later, or perhaps even on a semi-regular basis. Pradeep Mutalik explains this much better than I can, but on a base level it makes a certain amount of sense. If you're in the car wishing you had a plate of shrimp on which to snack and at that moment you pass a forty foot billboard depicting this desired crustacean, or if you have a dream about an ex you haven't spoken to in seven years, and he Facebook-friend-requests you the next day, it seems like pure prophecy. But when you think about all the billboards you'll pass and all the dreams you'll have over the course of your entire life, the odds that at least one will seem eerily prophetic are actually pretty good. Still, whether these wondrous occurrences are mathematical certainties or proof of a greater synchronicity, it's hard not to assign them with a literal or metaphorical meaning.
Which, my fellow Author-Friends, saddles us with the question of how we can best wield the mighty power of the coincidence in our fiction. Unbelievably unlikely things happen all the time, but how you dispatch them as plot points can make the difference between having a reader rapidly turning your pages or throwing your book against a wall in frustration. We all know that it should be our characters driving our stories. If Gatsby had just happened to move into the house across the water from Daisy's, Fitzgerald would have been writing quite a different book. I recently read a novel in which not one but two incredible chance events transpired in the first fifty pages and set the stage for the entire narrative, and immediately I heard my beloved agent's voice in my head whispering "Strains credibility." The very premise of a story can be rooted in a chance encounter--in Stephen King's Misery, the writer Paul Sheldon just happens to be rescued from a car wreck by a seriously demented woman who is obsessed with his books, what are the odds INDEED--but the unlikely set-up sets the stage for a completely character-driven story. King gets the hardest to believe part out of the way first, and whether you "buy it" or not quickly becomes irrelevant when Annie is sharpening her axe in the other room.
Sometimes these fortuitous moments are slipped in towards the end, perhaps when the author is at a loss for how to bring about a satisfying conclusion. Certainly it's easier to sneak shaky plotting past a reader after he or she has become thoroughly invested in your characters and outcome, but oh man can this shit backfire. The denouement of Richard Russo's Bridge of Sighs comes about only because one of the characters gets on a train and happens to sit next to a magazine that is open to a particular page revealing that the lost love of her youth will be at a nearby gallery opening THAT VERY NIGHT. Did Chérie want to put her wee fist through a wall when she read that OH YES SHE DID. Good sir, I realize that composing a six-hundred-page novel is likely exhausting, but please try to not so obviously run out of steam twelve pages before the end. Francesca Lia Block's novels are brimming over with such instances but she's a magical realist, and there's no pretense that it's "just a coincidence": synchronicity is her plot device, not chance. On the other hand, is it still something I can more or less imagine happening in this peculiar and complicated world of ours? Absolutely. And at the end of Arthur Nersesian's masterpiece The Fuck-Up, when the protagonist has hit bottom and runs into his nemesis from the beginning of the story, who will turn out to be his savior, instead of feeling contrived it all just fits. Nersesian is bringing his story full circle, with his protagonist living out one of the most organic instances of "eternal return" I've probably ever read on the page.
To quote the opening of Magnolia, "There are stories of coincidence and chance, of intersections and strange things told, and which is which and who only knows? And we generally say, 'Well, if that was in a movie, I wouldn't believe it.'" It is the humble opinion of this guest blogger that strange things happen all the time, but when we put them into our stories, we should do our best to remember the reader on the receiving end of our efforts, and do everything in our power to make them believe it.
Ah, I am reminded of my greatest moment of book rage. Somewhere in the early 2000's, I read Memoirs of a Geisha because I felt I was supposed to. I slogged through it, alternating between, "the landscape sounds lovely" to "these women are wearing me OUT" to "why the hell is Madonna obsessed with this book?" Eventually, I came to the end. When lo, the unattractive man, in true Disney fashion, is revealed to be evil, and the handsome man, in a style that I don't even think Walt would have tried to pull off, goes all deus ex machina on our asses and professes the love of the heroine, and ONLY THEN is she complete. When she is validated by the "love" of a guy she doesn't actually know. I put "love" in quotes because I know love, love is a friend of mine, and I am sorry, sir, but that is not love.
Thank you for the post! I do enjoy getting my rage on first thing in the morning!
MISERY is a particularly good book to reference in this post because King also "hangs a lantern" on the issue of coincidence when Paul Sheldon ponders one of the little ceramic figurines in Annie Wilkes' house: specifically, the penguin standing on a block of ice with "Now My Tale Is Told" written on it. If I'm remembering this right, the author-character thinks about how there are so many coincidences in life that ring false in fiction even though THEY REALLY DO HAPPEN, DAMMIT! It's quite interesting that King felt the need to elaborate on this principle when it came to the small recurring theme of the penguin, but not when it came to the big plot point of WHAT ARE THE ODDS that Paul Sheldon would be discovered by the greatest Paul Sheldon fanatic...
Because I think it is often the small items that jar us (the magazine on the train) rather than the big ones, just as readers can often suspend disbelief for, say, a plague that destroys humanity, but then get pissed off because the author got the ingredients of a certain chocolate bar wrong. (That would be King's The Stand.)
Tricky.
Honey, she can write.
(Damn, I amuse myself sometimes)
It's true, though! That was awesome, and I agree completely. And I'm much less excited about trying Richard Russo now.
Coincidences happen in threes . . . but seriously, sometimes life's random generator gets stuck.
Does anyone else think negative coincidences are generally more acceptable in fiction that positive ones?
I absolutely agree with the distinctions here.
1. Mystical realism allows for a lot more "the entire universe aligned for this moment" sort of events.
2. You can get away with it early in the story to drive plot or character. In the last quarter of the story, it's really hard to make it work.
3. If you put it in the last quarter of the story, could you please drop in a smallish hint somewhere earlier? Pretty please? Then, it feels like "Oh, wow. I love how the author wove that detail in there" instead of "Are you serious?"
And point 3 is why it annoys me so much. It's a pretty easy fix most of the time.
And...I'm glad you had such a great day! That sounds like more fun than moving a piano. Which is what I did.
As a reader I'm willing to suspend disbelief in the interest of escapism, but I am reluctant to immolate it entirely. Many a novel has caused me to shriek "Well isn't THAT convenient!" when an unlikely boon occurs--authors who entertain me mightily like Marisa de los Santos (Martin dies in a car crash? How nice for you not to have deal with the dilemma of adoring your boyfriend's kid whilst hating him!) and Laura Zigman (Oh, you misspelled something and now it has caught on as girl power slang and Tiffany & Co wants to put it on a necklace--very plausible!).
I hate that. Hate. It.
Also hate those Erich Segal-style books in which one's long lost ex boyfriend is the only brilliant doctor who could save one's life.
None of Diva's boyfriends managed to become gifted surgeons but some do have steady jobs now.
Cherie, I love this post! You know, a couple of years ago I read a very good (until the end) mystery about a bog body. It fell apart when they solved it through chancing to find a surviving 8th century manuscript that happened to tell the full story of the dead woman including the part that had been covered up in the official records. Aargh!
FWIW, I don't think coincidences are just chance. My God is a writer. Look at the whole of the 2008 Republican presidential campaign. If that wasn't highly structured comedy, I don't know what was!
Excellent post. And, it happens to me with every book I write.
And, Loretta Ross, ALL presidential campaigns are highly structured comedies these days. But what's even funnier is to watch what happens after the election when the truth eventually unfolds :)
Without coincidence, i.e., characters in the right place at the right time, events occurring in a certain order, it's very difficult to get a story to move forward. Otherwise, it's just...this happens and then that happens...and ultimately, not much happens at all. Coincidence does not necessarily involve suspension of disbelief - crazy stuff that doesn't fit into the story or is way out of character for the characters, does.
My life has been all about coincidence or serendipitous encounters.
WEETZIE BAT!
I almost baulked at the length of this post. I'm glad I trusted in Le R's judgement and dove in anyway. If only you posted more often Chérie.
"Truth is stranger than fiction" also means that fiction mustn't be as strange as truth.
To a certain extent, the starting of a good story almost always involves a certain amount of coincidence. The inciting incident happens to a person who is interesting, probably likeable, dynamic, and doubtless has some salient flaws. What are the chances of that?
I think it's perfectly acceptable to kick off a story with a coincidence, and completely unacceptable to resolve a story with a coincidence.
"Wow, look at that...oh shit, now what do I do?" is just fine for a beginning, but "Wow, that was lucky! Drinks on me!" as an ending cheats the reader.
A friend once told me about how weird it was that whenever she was out walking, the streetlights would go out. I'd seen the same thing when I lived in the city and had thought it was only me that happened to.
The truth is, those lights are going out all the time, and the only ones we actually see going out are the those around us, when we're right there. So it's got nothing to do with us – just an illusion of our own limited perspective.
There definitely are strange connections at work at times, where even logic sits back and says, "WTF?", but often it's just us, being storytellers, projecting meaning onto random events.
Post a Comment