Terminator Offers Some Lessons for the Salvation of Your Novel
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
We were so excited for Terminator: Salvation, we cannot even tell you. All our intellectual snobbery is reserved for books; when it comes to the cinematic experience, we demand constant explosions, post-apocalyptic scenarios, lots of aliens/robots/asteroids, and/or large-scale natural disasters (with occasional exceptions made for arty French films, obvs). After reading uniformly negative reviews of TS, we felt some anxiety about coughing up $14 to see it in a theater, and only got around to watching it this weekend. Well, nobody was lying. TS is a profoundly dumb movie, and not dumb in a gleeful Independence Day sort of way, with bad jokes and Jeff Goldblum being all cute. HOWEVER, something quite fortuitous happened in the first quarter of the film, when we realized that TS is flawed in the same ways a lot of the novel drafts we reject are flawed, and thus has a number of Instructive Points to offer our dear Author-friends (you see! we think about you ALL THE TIME! Do you feel loved, or what?). So here, out of the goodness of our blackened and desiccated heart, we present Imperatives of Fiction-Writing as Demonstrated by "McG."
1. You need a plot. You really, really do. A Good Idea ("What if it's the future! And robots are the boss of everything and this hot non-emotive dude has to find this kid who is actually his dad and send him back in time before the robots kill everyone!") is an excellent start, but a Good Idea is NOT sufficient to carry the entire vehicle of your novel. We don't care how highfalutin' your concept or your prose is; you leave out the plot and you are going to bore us out of our skull, and not because we are too stupid to comprehend the brilliance of your talent. You REALLY EXTRA-ESPECIALLY need a plot if you are working in genre fiction. Bonus points if your plot MAKES SENSE (see No. 2).
2. You need to demonstrate a chain of causality. You cannot just cut to your main character and his Trusty Sidekick of Color testing their Secret Weapon in the center of the Robots Valley of Death, in the middle of the night, apropos of nothing. Particularly after you have told us that the robots guard their turf assiduously and are extra-good at blowing people up in the dark. Why? Because your poor reader is going to be all like HOW THE FUCK DID THEY GET INTO THE MIDDLE OF ROBOTS DEATH VALLEY and not all like OOH HOW THRILLING! ROBOTS DEATH VALLEY! and the one thing you never, ever want your reader to be doing is being all distracted from your novel by piddly logistical details. Which leads us to:
3. You need to be consistent. Yes, it is an eighties-classy and awesome image (and perhaps the only classy and awesome image in this entire stupid movie) to have John Connor sticking a GNR cassette into a boombox and pressing play to serve as a robot-distracting ploy. But guess what? IT'S TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. We would have trouble finding a GNR tape and a boombox with which to play it RIGHT NOW, in the waning hours of 2009. Are we supposed to believe JC popped over to the nearest Goodwill so as to procure these items? Or perhaps he clutched his childhood tape-player and GNR tape collection to his manly breast through a nuclear apocalypse? Again, Author-friends, when you throw in stuff that you think is cool but makes no sense in the context of your book, your reader starts to hate and distrust you, and that is so not what you want happening. KILL ALL YOUR DARLINGS, dear ones. Kill 'em dead.
4. Your universe must have rules. Even if you are writing science fiction. Like, if you are creating a post-apocalyptic world controlled by robots but grounded in reality? Where people are still normal people just trying to survive and defeat said robots? You cannot impale your main character through the heart and have him continue to frolic about. You don't get to have your hero conveniently stumble across the robots' nuclear reactor, which they have left in the middle of the floor. Our Support Team would also like to point out that you don't get to fly a helicopter through a nuclear explosion, because nuclear explosions emit an electromagnetic pulse that shuts down everything electrical within their blast radius. You get to make stuff up, Author-friends, but you don't get to make stuff up that is totally implausible in the context of the world you have created.
5. You need to know what you're aiming for. The lovely INTERN had a very excellent post on this topic a while back. Maybe what you actually want to make is not a science fiction film but a killer Nine Inch Nails video, which is a supremely worthy goal in itself. Broken? Maybe one of the greatest albums ever, and we are completely unembarrassed to tell you that Nine Inch Nails opening for David Bowie at the Seattle Center in 1995 (we are a LOT older than you think we are, y'all) is to this day one of the best live shows we have ever seen. But a two-minute video is not a feature-length film. Just saying. Also, this is probably less relevant to your Novel, but if you use Nine Inch Nails in the preview you should FOLLOW THROUGH and get old Trent to do the soundtrack for your movie because otherwise Rejectionists get all excited ("OMG EXPLOSIONS AND ROBOTS AND THE APOCALYPSE AND NINE INCH NAILSSSS!!! EEEEEE!!!!!!!") and then feel let down and cranky when the soundtrack of your movie turns out to be Christian Bale grunting a lot.
6. You need a plausible grounds for romantic activity. By "plausible grounds" we do not mean "narrowly evading sexual assault thanks to rescue by hot dude." Narrowly evading sexual assault does not, in our experience, make the ladies feel frisky. In fact, can we retire the "narrow evasion of sexual assault thanks to rescue by hot dude" as a plot device FOREVER? CAN WE LET THAT ONE GO PLEASE? THANK YOU.
7. If you are going to use people of color in every "trusty sidekick/lesser-villain/mute adorable biracial child who serves as an indicator of the foxy foxy multiracial future" role WHY DON'T YOU GO OUT ON THE LIMB OF CRAZY AND MAKE A PERSON OF COLOR ONE OF YOUR MAIN CHARACTERS JUST TRY IT WE GUARANTEE IT WILL NOT KILL ANYONE.
Okee, there you go. Revise, little ones, REVISE!
In a pretty backwards way, this was a very inspirational post for me.
What does that say?
This is the best review I've ever read. Constructive AND funny.
I seriously doubt I'll enjoy Terminator Salvation based on all the bad reviews, but I'll probably end up watching it because I'm into punishment. Bad movies is why God made long island iced teas.
You make me laugh! :) And this is my Monday and I'm on day three of the Head Cold From Hell and I have to go out into the freezing drizzle now and go to work and you made me laugh anyway.
Thanks! :)
You know, there's one of the Star Trek novels I've considered writing something like this about (How To Make Me Throw Your Book Across The Room). I swear, it's a primer of what NOT to do in a story. But Janet says we shouldn't say mean things about anyone on our blog, so I'm not. O:)
lol I agree with everything you said except throwing the race card at this movie - Connor and Reece are established as white already, so there's not much that can be done about those.
You could make Worthington's character a person of color, but remember he was a death row inmate and a deviant scumbag, so like everyone would be mad about that type of stereotyping action.
Also, Will Smith is the biggest movie star in the world last time I checked - isn't this type of casting angst kinda passe?
Remembering a live NIN show from '95 is no indicator of advanced age, good lady. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's an indicator rockin' good taste and has nothing whatsoever to do with age. I plead the 5th on my own age, incidentally.
But this post exemplifies why I read you, Rejectionist-friend. Jolly entertaining, and all that.
You want a plot and revisions? No! We will not go quietly into that night! We will not vanish without a fight! We're going to live on without thinking! We're going to survive your logic! Today we celebrate our Independence Day from the laws of reality!
Ha! Agreed!
And hey, I remember that concert... I thought I was young?
Thank you for existing :)
SO TRUE about the escaping near sexual assault thing :P. Always makes me crazy. Plus, my husband and I totally yelled at the screen during the helicopter-in-a-nuclear-blast bit as well.
I <3 you :).
Great points about plot/consistency!
What a great post - hilarious and informative! This blog just gets better and better. I would really like to be best friends with it. Where can I send your handmaid braided friendship bracelet?
I was almost afraid to read this post because I thought (based on the title) that you might have LIKED the movie. You pretty much spouted off WORD FOR WORD what went through my head as I watched it. There were points where I laughed out loud at the stupidity...and yes, someone threw popcorn at the back of my head.
My husband shut them up, though. He's good at that. All he has to do is look at someone in a certain way and they'll piss their little 501 jeans before they realize it. You weren't really watching the movie anyway, dipshit. Go back to the corner and make out with your girlfriend. Or boyfriend. Whichever.
Anyway...he and I both write sci-fi, so we were VERY disappointed with that movie, for the same reasons you stated here. It was laughable. And not in a funny-ha-ha way. In a funny-career-killing way for every writer involved in its production.
Christian Bale did not help things either. Is there a reason why he felt the need to use his "Batman" voice in this movie? It didn't fit. I cringed whenever he opened his mouth. Or moved at all, really.
AND WHY THE EFFING-H DID THEY MAKE IT CLEAR THAT HIS WIFE WAS PREGNANT IF IT WASN'T GOING TO BE USED IN THE STORY AT ALL WHATSOEVER?!!!
I think that ticked me off more than anything. I kept waiting for something horrible to happen to her, or her baby by default, and ruin the space-time continuum, and they would have to kiss at the "Fish Under the Sea" dance before their kids disappeared from the photo, or however that works, and it never did. At least that would have been semi-interesting.
I could really go on FOREVER about this, but I'll spare you. This is not worth my frustration. Going back to writing REAL sci-fi now.
Out.
LOL, thanks for this. Particularly #7.
Thanks again.
One last thing, then I'm shutting up for reals.
Number 6 is thoroughly quotable. Expect it to be quoted. Thoroughly.
Why did the Terminator-motorcycles have handle bars and controls? Who are they for? Who rides a Terminator motorcycle AND, honestly... wouldn't a robot motorcycles find this demeaning?
Seattle? SEATTLE??!! The Center!!!???
Oh the beauty!!
And yes. Plots are good and concepts are just a start...
Very cool post and um...think I'll skip the movie.
I am more than a little disappointed. I planned on renting that DVD this week. How can you ruin a robot apocalypse? They should be ashamed.
Lydia: I'm going to be laughing about the kissing at the fish under the sea dance for the rest of the day.
Le R: OMG! You like Jeff Goldblum, too? That boy I married cannot wrap his brain around the fact that I have a fangirl crush on Goldblum. And NIN? Nothing is finer than rolling down the windows and tooling around in my Honda minivan (with the luggage rack and the infant seats and dog noseprints on the glass) blowing out the poor speakers with NIN. Makes me want to sneak a cigarettte.
LOVE the post. Unfortunately I did cough up the cash to see TS in the theater, and I'm still bitter about it...
However, thanks to your inspirational post, now at least I feel like I got something for my $20.
You are awesome.
Thank you, ohmylord thank you. This was very cathartic for me. I love me some Christian Bale and the movie should have had 3 movies' worth of backstory to carry it through, but I just sat there, laughing my ass off, completely unable to give a $^!# about ANY of the characters. You nailed every.single.thing that bothered me about this movie.
Okay, I didn't know about nuclear blasts also emitting EMPs, but I do know enough physics to have called SHENANIGANS repeatedly during the "gosh, I've never seen a car before, let me now do some amazing driving" chase scene. Glarg.
I'll see your 1995 NIN/David Bowie concert in Seattle and raise you a 1992 GNR/Metallica stadium tour in Jersey.
Wait, wait, wait CKHB nothing is raisable (is that a word :D) over a 1995NIN/David Bowie in Seattle. Sorry, not possible isn't happening. Oh, did I tell you I'm from Washington and YES THE STATE to all the Texans who think that Washing DC is a state grrrr.
Okay off that soap box. I really enjoy reading your reasonings as they are 1) funny, 2)logical, 3) easy to follow and 4) correct.
My husband and I have done live theatre for 12+ years now. He's been stage manager for a road house, technical director at a casino, and we have both acted and helped "produce" local community plays through set builds/designs and costume making, not to mention makeup spotlights, etc. So we can say we have the experience to see when something is not done well.
I HATE when they do things like the EMP and all the airplanes/helicopters work. Makes me crazy. Soemtimes I have to shut my husband up because he takes away from the magic of make-believe. But sometimes, sometimes, they pull the make-believe away and make it BS. Then I sigh and we both spend the whole movie tearing it apart :P those are the fun dates though LOL
Ms. Sharp, I can assure you that TERMINATOR: SALVATION did not kill any writer's career. Are you kidding me? A screenwriter's career is not based on merit. It's based on credits. In fact, it's safe to say that if a script you wrote goes into production, no matter how bad the movie is reviewed and no matter how much money it loses, you'll get more and better paying jobs as a result. Trust me: the half dozen folks who worked on that script are busy cashing paychecks and lounging around their Hollywood Hills mansions.
That post was stuffed to the gills with le AWESOMENESS!. I agree with everything that the others have said and just want to add that I can out FANGIRL anyone here (thumb war to prove it) as the biggest BOWIE/NIN minion. And from my very own Youtube favorites I present:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCMLwbdSrTY
What would we do without Le R to steer us clear?? Falter, I fear.
LOL! Learning is always better when it's entertaining.
I shall go change my Depends before editing my mansucript with these pointers in mind!
"Your universe must have rules. Even if you are writing science fiction."
Somebody else said this first, but if you're writing sci fi, you, in fact, *better* have rules because inconsistency is the death of world building.
Rejectionist--if I can ask a question within this very comment? Re: Make A Main Character Colored. I'm writing fantasy set in a re-imagined Middle Eastern culture. Peoples of a fake Arabic/Persian culture took over a savanna and enslaved the resident tribes 300 yrs before or so, when the empire was established. This being said, Main Character's chief military man is a descendant of such tribal peoples. These would have been black tribal peoples. I didn't do this on a whim. They live in a savanna; they're going to be dark-skinned. That's just science. Do we still feel like that would come off as Colored Sidekick Syndrome? In your professional opinion, is there any way to avoid that impression?
I'm still tittering. This is much like my reaction to Land of the Lost. It was so awful my IQ dropped by the minute.
I still love Christian Bale. I'll always love him for being in American Psycho.
A plot? A PLOT?! That's just crazy-talk!
I don't feel so bad now for interjecting in threads on the NaNo humor forums saying, "Yes, you do, in fact, need things to happen in your novel. 'Wacky people standing around being wacky wacky wacky. WACKY!' doth not a novel make." If I had a nickel for every person who gave the advice that you don't need any plot in a novel, I'd have enough to go buy myself a cassette of GNR!
Bahahaha! Love number 4. Action films obey their own laws of physics. My favourite: Bond and a plane falling off a cliff in Goldeneye and Bondy CATCHES UP TO the plane as they fall, by sheer determination of his winged eyebrows, it seems.
Ardendra: I am NOBODY whose opinion should matter to you but as a consumer of books I would have no issue with what you propose. That is not an arbitrary minority sidekick character unless you also make him gay and he is inexplicalby crucial for all shopping expeditions. What you're describing is totally legit and a few people (like me)might notice if you avoid any racial reference.
(Darn it, one of my comments got lost. Trying again...)
The fact that a lot of Bale's scenes have nothing to do with the (theoretical) plot may not be entirely the writers' fault.
McG originally offered the part of the human-cyborg to Bale. Bale insisted on playing the far less interesting John Connor instead, reasoning that Connor *should* be the MC.
It looks to me like McG rebalanced the movie to give Bale-as-Connor a bunch of extra screen time, without giving him any more story.
I was actually more bothered by the fact that a veterinarian seemingly did a heart transplant (and with no anti-rejection meds, how that's going to work out I don't know) than most the other stuff, but what can you do?
Lydia - I think she was pregnant purely to follow through with the continuity of the third movie in which Ah-nold says she has 3 children before he dies. I was actually kind of refreshed by the fact that she didn't have a baby. People are pregnant for 9 months, they don't always have babies during dramatic points in time. Sometimes babies are just born on "Tuesday".
I think she was pregnant purely to follow through with the continuity of the third movie in which Ah-nold says she has 3 children before he dies.
Okay, that makes sense. Forgot about that. But I still have issue with them not saying a damn thing about it in this movie, which is explained somewhere in the mess below. Read at your own risk.
People are pregnant for 9 months, they don't always have babies during dramatic points in time.
My husband actually said the same thing when I questioned it. Here's my problem, though. This is a movie, aka not real life. Every last detail is pre-planned for some kind of effect.
When I first saw her character, I thought, "Hmm. She could pop at any moment. Wonder how that fits in."
A pregnant woman is noticeable. And she is not just any pregnant woman, she is the wife of the MC (well, sort of...I really couldn't tell you who the true MC of that story was: John Connor, Kyle Reese, or Marcus the Machine Man).
Now I'm not saying that her pregnancy had to have some grand significance (if it had, that would have been interesting, as I stated above), but at the very least, they could have mentioned it in some way, even in passing. Like, for instance, John looks at her belly and says, "Hey, at least this baby's father isn't 15 and stuck in the future/past/whatever-it-is-because-I-honestly-get-a-headache-form that-whole-story-line."
Or something like that.
But no, they just ignore it completely, like she isn't knocking people over with her giant uterus every time she turns. Seriously. She was not just a little bit pregnant.
Did the actress just happen to be pregnant at the time of filming? That wouldn't surprise me, especially after Keith's comment that you can do shitty work and not have it affect your resume at all.
Excuse me, Le R, but I seem to be in rant mode today. Sorry for the excess wordage. I'll make up for it with a double shipment on Friday. Promise.
LOVE IT!!!!!!!!
Astute, clever, and patently hysterical (' narrowly evading sexual assault does not, in our experience, make the ladies feel frisky'...someone please tell crime novelists this!).
Love this post; I almost, almost watched this movie with my boyfriend last night, thanks for the heads up. I have a feeling I'll have to watch it with him eventually though. Love your points about plot, and making my novel make sense consistently. Great advice--you rock.
Now that's what I call a close encounter!
Okay, I kinda love Independence Day. B-Movie goodness.
For some reason I take much more joy (and have much more patience for) cheesy pulp in movies than I do in literature. Books... not much tolerance anymore. But I like me a good B-movie action flick. Brain release. Explosions! Woo hoo!
And if you want a good evisceration of this film, check out the review by novelist Catherynne M. Valente here.
I must point out that a veterinarian performing a heart transplant is way more likely than a helicopter flying through a nuclear explosion.*
While we're on the subject of things we'd like never to see again, can we PLEASE not make the villain's entire motivation for badness be the fact that his PREGNANT WIFE DIED? (For those not privy to the jumps in my brain, we're now on the new Star Trek rather than TS.) The villain saw HIS WHOLE PLANET BE ANNIHILATED but apparently the death of multiple billions of people was not sufficient motivation for him to seek revenge. No, if his wife had only lived...a little meditation, a little healing massage, and he'd have gotten over the whole my-homeworld-was-eaten-by-a-supernova thing. But she died, and therefore HE MUST DEVOTE HIS LIFE TO DESTROYING insert spoiler here. YAWN.
*Let the record reflect that I am a veterinarian, and therefore hugely biased.
when i grow up i want to be funny like you.
We recommend the movie 2012 - for many of the same reasons. Sight gags and bending the laws of gravity within a 50 years old geophysical theory does not a story make.
The plus was casting a hero of color, who almost had as much film time as the antihero.
Regarding using the advertisement soundtrack as the actual soundtrack of the movie, this is what killed Starship Troopers for me. Not the crap acting. Not the logistical plot holes. Not Doogie Howser (actually, he was the only redeeming quality, I thought...might just be me). What killed it for me was the fact that every commercial for months had Blur's heart-revving guitar riffs leading to a mosh-pit-inducing "WooHOO!"
And where was the woohoo in the movie? Nowhere until the ending credits, long long after I had stopped caring.
I so wanted this movie to be good. I really, truly did. The character (glimpsed briefly in the previews) of the robot dude who thought he was human could have been fascinating and emotionally exciting and tragic and awesome...
But alas, that didn't happen. I haven't even seen the movie - but I have heard from scads of trusted friends and sources how much it sucked, so I didn't bother.
I just watched this instead:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P7yx3q3m8k
FANTASTIC post, btw. Thank you for making me laugh 'til I peed. :)
Wait, you know someone with a boombox?
But really, excellent guide to how not to crap on one's audience.
And while it may not be raisable over NIN/Bowie, for sheer age alone I call with a 1985 Clash concert in Portland.
*bows* Thank you, thank you, and thank you again for saying these things. As a spec fic writer I hate what Hollywood does to science fiction films. Totally makes the genre seem to be written by idiots who can't think, when they produce movies like that.
Amen, sister.
Loved the tips for writing. Will keep those in mind :)
I was lucky I didn't have to pay to watch this movie. My husband and I got it as a free rental since it was my birthday. Thank goodness. Christian Bale totally annoyed me, and I usually love his acting. Except for his role in Batman. I think his earlier work was better, especially "Newsies." Can't beat a singing and dancing Christian Bale :)
I was so excited for this movie too. CHRISTIAN BALE AS JOHN CONNOR!!! I thought, there is no way they can go wrong with that combo. And then McG proved me wrong.
Your review was dead on. I didn't care about any of the characters, the plot made no sense (and messed up the previous movies' timelines - jerks), and the action scenes were not even that cool.
The trailer with the NIN music was so awesome, and then to have no NIN in the movie... it was just another blow. I say, lets just watch the trailer and forget the movie ever happened.
Seeing Nine Inch Nails in 1995 doesn't make you that old. Or, if it does, I am a freakin' dinosaur. Just saying.
You guys should definitely review "Live Free or Die Hard." The only thing constant in that movie is action.
Great post. We saw it in the theater and then my husband went and rented it the other day! He'd forgotten we'd already seen it.
I also like #7, escpecially since three out of my four novels have a person of color as the main character. I'm not afraid!
"You guys should definitely review 'Live Free or Die Hard.' The only thing constant in that movie is action."
No it isn't.
In a pretty backwards way, this was a very inspirational post for me.
Work from home India
These are the same arguments someone made about Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. See this link, which had me laughing:
http://blog.writersdigest.com/norules/2009/12/22/GreatStorytelling101OrWeveForgottenHowToTellStories.aspx
Post a Comment