On Rejection
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
The publishing interwebs were afire last week with differing opinions as to the wonderfulness or nefariousness of the unpublished; there was this post from the indefatigable posi-core powerhouse Nathan Bransford, this post from the brilliant and funny Eric of Pimp My Novel (note to self after reading ensuing comments from self-publishers: do NOT f*ck with self-publishers, good lord (note to self-publishers: we agree 1,000% with Eric, along with everyone else who works in ACTUAL (ooh, snap!) publishing, sorry; but good luck to you!)), and some other posts by certain wise and beloved agents and anonymous editors who clearly have received one too many of the "Dear To Whom It May Concern I always knew I had to be a Writer you will be glad to recieve my short Story Collection for children entitled Muffy the Bunnies Adventure in Christmasville it is a touching inspirationel Collection of 234,552 words guranteed bestseller oportunity with Film Potential" sort of query.
Most of the people we meet in publishing are not actually writers themselves. Not so us, dear author-friends, and, like you, we have an elegant collection of rejection letters from only the finest and most discerning literary magazines, except for McSweeney's, who we are still waiting to hear back from re: a story we sent them in 1937, but we are sure it is only taking so long because D-Eggs wants to confirm the film deal with Spielbs before he calls us personally, and everyone knows how slow Spielbs is! But here, dear author-friends, is a truth we have learned and accepted the hard way, through Personal Knowledge and Experiential Learning, and also at our Job, which is: Not everyone is going to get published. In fact, very very few people are going to get published. In fact, we reject a hundred people a week who will never, ever, ever get published. Plenty of the people who do get published will publish books that are worse than yours. Or, you might write a book, and it might not be very good. We ourself might not ever, ever get published. We ourself might not be very good. Sorry. Them's the haps. The fact is, THE WORLD WILL CONTINUE. For all of us. And if you love writing, you'll keep writing. Yes, it would be nice to have Our Brilliant Novel in a shiny new dustjacket (Chip Kidd, natch! Only the best for us!) to send our parents and also Birch Rubens, wherever he is, who told us when we were ten that we clearly sucked eggs and would never publish a book ever, shortly before hitting us over the head with his sister's hairbrush. Yes, it would be nice to have our Staggering Talent validated, our vacations to Aruba and charming retreat home in the Catskills paid for with our Unheard-Of Advance, our international book tour, our Salman Rushdie blurb, our front-page review in the New York Times with the title: Luminary Genius Arises! Voice of the Century Discovered! Better than Nabokov For Reals! And yes, no offense to "Steve," it would be nice to quit working altogether and loaf about, delegating the penning of our various sequels to a small army of talented interns while we are fed gingersnaps and cocktails by our Support Team.
But also, those things might not ever happen. We might write a book and nobody will notice. Will that be sad for us? Yep. Will that be the end of our life? Proof that our existence is, in fact, without any redeeming purpose? Probably not.
Darling author-friends, we are NOT by any means telling you not to write. We are offering you asort of tough-love approach, a refusal to delude you with promises of puppies and unicorns. Persistence does not always pay off with laurels upon which to rest. We could practice swimming sixteen hours a day for the next ten years, and we still won't be going to the Olympics; sew dresses until our fingers fall off, and no one will be inviting us to fashion week; and, let's face it, all of us could write every hour of every day for the rest of our lives and ain't none of us going to come up with Lolita . Brush your little selves off and keep your chins up. We know it's hard because we've been there, and are in fact hanging out there, making occasional embittered comments about the "immature style" of people younger than us who are cranking out critically acclaimed novels that are, like, soooo much dumber than the book we are totally going to write as soon as we finish looking at this one last fashion blog. We are not immune to the perils of jealousy, impotent rage, and deep-seated feelings of our own superiority. We are also not consoling ourselves with the thought that The Da Vinci Code was rejected 125,642 times; The Da Vinci Code was rejected 125,642 times because it's not a good book , and, quite frankly, the world would have been a better place if the 125,643rd person had rejected it too. Work at it because you love it, because it makes you happy, because you want to; and if you never get published, you will know that you persisted because you were writing for yourself. Not your mom, not Birch Rubens, not the fickle and often insane publishing industry, not the (let's face it: highly improbable) vacation home, not the people who've told you you're no good, not your skeptical and disparaging aunt/partner/parent/sibling/mean friend. For yourself and yourself alone. And if you finish your book, and you love it, by all means send it out into the world and hope for the best. And if it sucks, query Nathan Bransford. Not us. Heh. Sorry, Nathan.
Hey. You didn't have to use my story collection Muffy the Bunnies Adventure in Christmasville as your example. That's hitting below the belt.
Thanks for this post. Oddly enough, I found it encouraging, probably because living in a culture of constant "everyone's a winner," you-can-do-it self-helpitude gets me down sometimes, as it feels like BS. Tough love is honest and refreshing.
P.S. Word verification: blamings
But I am a good writer! My mom even said that I am. Why would she lie?
"We are also not consoling ourselves with the thought that The Da Vinci Code was rejected 125,642 times; The Da Vinci Code was rejected 125,642 times because it's not a good book, and, quite frankly, the world would have been a better place if the 125,643rd person had rejected it too."
Thank you, truth-speaker. THANK YOU.
You make a good point; I don't remember ever seeing anyone without fingers at Fashion Week.
I liked this, seriously. Good to be reminded that the success of my life is not defined or even much affected by the success of my writing ventures.
Even "The DaVinci Code" offers hope - there ARE homes for good stories that are poorly written.
These writers that inspire blog posts like these must've played on the little league teams where everyone got a trophy and nobody lost so that EVERYONE could be a winner.
Competition is healthy, and necessary when one wants to win..or get published.
Nice, well-written post. I think the best advice I can think of to writers is to remember that the world doesn't revolve around your latest manuscript. There's no point sending a rambling, self-serving query about how brilliant and crucial to the continuation of the human species your novel is if it isn't well written. Of course a writer thinks his novel is the greatest thing since sliced bread--he wrote it. There's no point in singing your book's praises. Keep queries short and to the point so publishers can get to the manuscript itself.
When I saw the title of this post I was half expecting a poem. Something like:
Pain and sorrow/grief and woe/I said, "oh, please!"/but they just said "no".
The DaVinci Code was pretty awful, but Dave Barry's take on it was pretty good.
Apropos of nothing, my word verification is "babbils". I think I'm going to have to start saving word verifications for character and place names. :-/
Well, Nathan's saying is, "When in doubt, query me first," so he kinda brought that last comment on himself. ;)
And speaking of The DaVinci Code...when I was purchasing a (better) book the other day, the cashier says, "Have you read The DaVinci Code or Angels and Demons?" I laughed (yes, I laughed) and said, "Sorry that just doesn't interest me." The guy gets all serious like I'd just stabbed his gut and says, "The third book is coming out soon and I just wanted to know if you'd like to reserve a copy." I laughed again. He walked away.
You used double parentheses in thie post. I think I love you. In a totally not creepy, let's-see-other-people kind of way.
Been reading your words; enjoying, nodding... however, I felt compelled to leave a footprint after reading the words "Muffy the Bunnies Adventure in Christmasville..." and ejecting a little coffee out through my nose. That HURT. But it woke me up, and that does help get my day going.
Reading this-- and several of your other posts-- takes me back to creative writing in college, and one Prof. Rick Byars' words. He pointed out to his class of aspiring Hemingways that publishers rarely want to publish "literature," they want to publish "pulp fiction dreck," because that's what 99% of the Gennerel Publick are (and are CAPABLE of) buying and reading. Based on what I see on the racks at most bookstores, he wasn't THAT far off the mark. That's not a criticism of the publishing industry... after all, they are there to make money, not to be literary philanthropists.
love your brutal honesty
Post a Comment