A Different Kind of Book Banning
Friday, October 1, 2010
So! Now we would like to talk about something more serious than poor old Alice and her mayonnaise hair! Which is racism! As the ever-astute Nathan Bransford noted this week, banning books in the age of the internet is largely a symbolic act, one which rarely prevents kids from getting their hands on those books and which can even lead to a huge spike in sales for the banned book in question (as demonstrated last week by Speak's impressive jump in Amazon sales rankings, thanks to the publicity campaign by new Rejectionist bestie Dr. Scroggins (in solidarity: The Rejectionist officially bans all books by Carleen Brice! Get purchasing, people!)).
But what about books that are banned in a different, and far more insidious way? Perennially brilliant bloggers and writers Zetta Elliott and Doret of Happy Nappy Bookseller put together a list of YA books by US authors of African descent this year, and the results are pretty staggering (even to us, and we would consider ourself someone who is, at this point, entirely unsurprised by rampant industry-wide douchebaggery). Out of the ALA's estimated 3,000 YA titles published annually in the US, want to know how many of those were by black authors in 2010?
Yep, sixty.
So: that's pretty fucking sad. The statistics for 2009, gathered by the CCBC* and also covering books by Latino, American Indian, and Asian/Pacific Islander writers, are even more depressing.
Like Zetta, we are pretty tired of talking about this. Racism: it is boring. There are only so many different ways a person can say KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF AND PONY UP TO THE REAL WORLD, PUBLISHING. We are tired enough of talking about it as a white person, who does not in any way, shape or form have to deal with that level of discrimination in an industry we hope to make a career in; we cannot even imagine what it is like to be a writer of color looking at those odds. This is an issue not just shaped by consumers--hardly, since youth of color are literally clamoring to see themselves represented more fully on the printed page. It's an issue shaped from the top down, by an industry that is horrifyingly monochrome.
Zetta has come up with a great list of actions you can take, including asking YA bloggers you follow to spotlight some of these books and requesting your local schools and libraries order them. We would add to that list only this: this is industry-wide, and it is real, and it is our job to BELIEVE PEOPLE WHEN THEY SAY THAT RACISM IS HAPPENING. Can we put that in larger caps please? DON'T ARGUE WITH THAT SHIT. Just ASK WHAT YOU CAN DO. There is no excuse for not publishing writers of color, for not putting the same marketing dollars behind writers regardless of their race, for bullshit lines like "these books don't sell." These books don't sell because they are unpromoted, unsupported, and passed over by chain stores when they have people of color on the covers. Not because black and brown people don't know how to put a fucking sentence together.
Let's not forget the stories that aren't being allowed to be told, and let's raise our voices in solidarity to demand a space for them in the world of books. The entire internet got behind Laurie Halse Anderson last week, and it was pretty awesome. We have the power to make change when we demand it, Author-friends, so let's ALL START DEMANDING.
*The number of books published in these stats includes picture books, which the ALA's estimate does not.
Yes.
Writing a post now.
HEAR, HEAR!!! Well said. Earlier I commented on someone's post that maybe banning books is a good thing because it generates a lot of attention for those books and gets adults and teenagers more interested in reading them. And that's a wonderful thing! Probably not what banners saw coming, so MUHAHAHA to them!
I was surprised we found 60 titles. I thought it would be around 40.
Maybe I am jaded or I have simply embraced lower expectations (the classic SNL skit) when it comes to MG/YA books written by authors of color.
Sadly when it comes to books by authors of color, African American authors are way ahead of the curve.
I only found 13 MG/YA titles written by Latino authors in 2010
I won't continue breaking down releases by race because it just gets much much worse.
If all the MG/YA titles by authors of color released in 2010 were added together, I would be very surprised to hit 100 titles.
Not allowing people to tell their own story is a form of censorhsip.
Thank you for this post and continuing to get the word out.
It's up.
Hope I didn't put my privileged foot in it.
I'm not entirely sure what this post is saying, honestly.
Is it laying the blame on publishers for not publishing authors based solely on their race?
Or is it implying that certain races aren't writing stories worth publishing as much as statistics say they should be?
Or is it saying that books with heavy ethnic themes aren't selling well but publishers should ignore that and publish them anyway?
I'm sort of confused. :(
Amen. I'm worried about this for my peers and myself as well. I'll ask my friends to help get the word out.
We write clearly; it's not our fault if people aren't clever.
Sorry, apparently I'm not that bright either. ^_^
I'm also not trying to pick a fight, I'm just working through some things that didn't make complete sense to me.
Why would publishers not buy books because of the ethnicity of the author? How would the reader even be able to tell? Or is it based on the premise that people write characters of their own ethnicity?
I wholeheartedly agree that publishers should buy books because they're awesome and not pay any attention to what colour the author is. Or what colour the MC is.
I can see from that statistic (60?!) that there is definitely something off going on, and I'm certainly not arguing that there is no such thing as racism. I mean, that's only .02% when (according to another blog I just read on the same subject) the African American population of America is something around 10%. That is seriously crap, and yes, things need to be done and I love all your ideas for helping out.
I just find it a little hard to swallow that all the assistants who read the query letters, the editors who make the purchase choices - they're ALL racist? (Well, 60 of them aren't, but do you see where I'm going here?)
I think Tchann was going off your statement that big chain stores won't heavily promote books with a coloured protagonist on the cover. If that's true, then the publishers (who are running a business) would have a huge financial disincentive to publishing such a book.
So is there a wider issue here than just "it's all the fault of the publishers"?
We are kind of not into having the "Institutional Racism: It's Not Just the KKK! and In Fact Well-Meaning People Also Can Participate In This Complex Problem!" 101 conversation again today? Writers of color and allies have been blogging about this issue (in publishing specifically) for years. Literally. Avail yourselves of Google; it's an effective tool for people willing to put in some energy. Also: Tim Wise. Who is real smart, writes about this stuff all the time, and gets paid to answer those questions.
And! in all honesty, we are not trying to pick a fight either. But we see people ask THE SAME QUESTIONS WORD FOR WORD every time WE write about racism in publishing and every time we see ANYONE ELSE write about racism in publishing, which is why we get so fucking CRANKY ABOUT THOSE COMMENTS. At a certain point, you are basically either with us, or you are not. If you are with us, be an awesome ally and do your homework (believe us, if the Rejectionist can do this homework, anyone can do this homework). If you are not, read a different blog. WE GET TIRED. People of color, from what we hear, get REALLY tired. Blogging about institutionalized racism does not obligate us, or anyone else who blogs about it, to explain it every single time we talk about it.
You ROCK! That's all I have to say...
Post a Comment