sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand
About

Today we are feeling a little more serious, Author-friends, after reading this unbelievably amazing post on bullying by the superlative Neesha Meminger, whose blog you should be following RIGHT NOW WHY AREN'T YOU, and this other also amazing post on internet harassment by blogger Annaham over at Tiger Beatdown. Bullying is something we have been thinking about ourself a lot lately, since a pile of bull(y)shit is now law in Arizona, and we know it's probably going to be overturned since, you know, racial profiling is like sort of technically illegal, which is so reassuring and why it never ever happens in real life; but the fact that that bill even made into the arena of public discourse, let alone was signed into law by the governor, is hurting our heart pretty fucking hard. On a more personal level we have been thinking about bullying since it is springtime in New York, a season when the ladies tend to wear REVEALING GARMENTS (you know, like short-sleeved shirts) and the gentlemen are stirred into an understandable FRENZY OF EXCITEMENT at the UTTERLY SCANDALOUS sight of, like, NAKED ELBOWS, and make free with the street harassment (for the record, New York is in no way more egregious than other places in this department; there are just a lot more people here, so the number of advances per block increases exponentially), and there are some days getting followed down the street by a dude yelling scary shit is not really what we're in the mood for. Shocking, we know.

Both Annaham and Neesha make the point that what gets referred to as "bullying" (as in, it's just "bullying," you'll get over it) is ultimately a deliberate and pointed targeting of difference, of people (queer, disabled, female, brown) who have less power by people who have more power. Both Annaham and Neesha point out that this kind of harassment gets dismissed all the time: it's just high school, it's just "illegal" "aliens" which is clearly not the same thing as actual human beings, it's just the internet, it's just dudes on the street, what's your problem, leave the room, love it or leave it, grow up, what do you expect when you dress like that, you'll get over it, shut up. But for those of us who deal with this shit in one way or another, to greater and lesser degrees, as ladies and queer people and people of color and disabled people and people who are sometimes all of those things AT ONCE, for those of us who deal with this shit EVERY DAY OF OUR LIVES, it can make a day real long.

So really what we wanted to say, from the bottom of our heart, to Neesha and Annaham and the many people out there who make our own life a little more easy, knowing you all are carrying the flag of the people's revolution and saying amazing things and not shutting up, what we wanted to say is thank you, and you're awesome.

Neesha says this:

Part of empowering young people is to show them reflections of themselves as powerful, valuable, important members of their communities - no less deserving of privilege, love, wealth, dignity and respect than their peers. I know from experience that stories do that. Stories heal and mend and expand. Stories in books, stories in the news, stories in film, on television and in magazines. It's part of the reason I started writing to begin with.

And it's true, y'all, fellow standardbearers of the good fight, young people and not-so-young people alike; so let's tell OUR stories like nobody's business.

Joseph L. Selby said...

To answer your question on how the Arizona law made it into the public discourse, it's a matter of local politics vs. national politics and the anger/fear of the people.

First, a story that received little national coverage, an Arizona rancher was murdered. The suspects are drug runners crossing the border onto his land.

Border porousness and security is already a big deal in the border states and the farther away we get from 9/11, the less national attention there is on the issues.

Second, Arizona has a small legislature. It has 30 senators and 60 representatives. This means you need a total of 46 people to pass a bill.

So take a red state with a blue president and kill an innocent rancher. The "if the federal government won't do something, we will" mentality is the next logical conclusion.

But you're right, the law will get shot down in the courts. It has in the past. New Hampshire passed something similar (with a much larger legislative body, so what the hell is our excuse?) and the courts shot it down. That precedence will be helpful when this new law goes to court.

April 27, 2010 10:04 AM
Damyanti said...

I have been the "other": a foreigner in various countries, and a girl in a country where the heckling is called "eve-teasing" and dismissed with a smile.

A big cheer to your post and to the two ladies you quote!

April 27, 2010 10:06 AM
Genie of the Shell said...

Thanks for these great links! I'm very disturbed by the "might makes right" mentality in our nation right now that is justifying violence, threats, and all kinds of aggressive behavior by conservative white males (aka "real America") against... everyone else. Ugh. That's not mature, intelligent, or healthy behavior for any kind of person, in any culture. Keep up the dialogue and education.

April 27, 2010 10:13 AM
The Rejectionist said...

The astounding mental acrobatics required to go from "a random person was shot this one time" to "we should probably arrest everyone in Arizona who doesn't look white" are just plumb out of reach for our feeble little lady-brain.

April 27, 2010 10:15 AM
Lyn Miller-Lachmann said...

Thank you for posting this. Today's societal bullies have become quite adept at taking up the mantle of victimhood, but the important thing to keep in mind is: Who has the power? Is it impoverished immigrants, or the people who hold the land, own the corporations and the media, and occupy those seats in the legislature? Glenn Beck claims that he and people like him are victims, but he has a national radio and television program. We have only blogs, and if the foes of net neutrality get their way, we may not have even that.

April 27, 2010 10:59 AM
Rianaire said...

Not that I ever really was, but I'm no longer proud to live in Arizona. We're not all crazy, paranoid, gun-toting, racist politicians. I just hope that, when it's found unconstitutional, the media will cover that just as much as they're covering it's passage, and people will know there are ethics here. Meanwhile, I'm lying about where I live every time I travel.

April 27, 2010 11:24 AM
Fleur Bradley: said...

As a legal immigrant, I'm forever amazed at the nasty, hateful things people tell me about illegal immigrants. All assuming I must agree, since I'm white and legal and all.

Cheers for sharing this.

April 27, 2010 11:28 AM
Biography said...

Brilliant post! Chimamanda Adichie talked about the danger of hearing only one story (about all those others you mentioned) for children at TED. She even discussed 'the trouble with Mexican immigration'
here.

April 27, 2010 11:49 AM
Tahereh said...

thank you.

seriously.

April 27, 2010 12:14 PM
Alex said...

amen.

April 27, 2010 12:41 PM
Ink said...

Who the hell am I going to whistle at then? Mmmmm?

Okay, in all seriousness, that was great.

April 27, 2010 1:25 PM
Ink said...

Biography,

I have no idea who you are but I think you're fantastic for mentioning Adichie. I've been sort of a fanboy of hers since reading Half of a Yellow Sun. Which EVERYBODY SHOULD READ. RIGHT NOW. No, not then. NOW.

April 27, 2010 1:26 PM
Ellen said...

"a girl in a country where the heckling is called "eve-teasing" and dismissed with a smile." <-- Not to name any names, but yeah, been to countries like that... And then they inform you during your orientation to the new culture that if you don't put up with the heckling you'll be seen as the ugly American. Mmm, Catch-22s.

April 27, 2010 1:58 PM
The Rejectionist said...

Everyone! Traveling to another country where the people do not look like you is not a remotely analogous experience to experiencing racism, homophobia, or the threat of sexual assault. Please do not make us have that conversation today, it makes us REALLY FUCKING TIRED. Thanks.

April 27, 2010 2:15 PM
amy said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
April 27, 2010 2:27 PM
Colin said...

I'm in law enforcement here in AZ, and we now have the most admirable job of picking "illegal" immigrants from a crowd and arresting them, or we get sued.
Oh, also, we (rightfully so) cannot profile to do this, or we get sued.

Resources are limited, and we try to focus on dangerous crime. If you want me to harass non-anglos instead of investigating your uncle's murder, that's fine, it's your dime.
Please ask the experts before making a decision on such things, though.

April 27, 2010 2:54 PM
The Rejectionist said...

Amy: the Arizona law IS FUCKING RACIST. You don't agree with us, read a different fucking blog. Any more comments along the lines of "YOU LIBERALS ARE THE OPPRESSOR BULLIES" or "WHITE PEOPLE HURT TOO" are gonna get deleted faster than you can say "the rejectionist sure needs a drink today."

April 27, 2010 3:52 PM
amy said...

Colin,

My understanding is that the law allows you to ask about status if a subject/suspect is already being investigated for another crime. (I.e., you can't just walk up to someone and ask for proof of their citizenship.) So in your example, if the murdered uncle leads you to someone you believe might be illegal, you can ask at that point.


Rejectionist,

I meant my comment to be respectful. I read your blog because it is (usually) amusing. I had no idea you didn't allow/like any form of dissent. My mistake.

April 27, 2010 3:59 PM
Chérie said...

Let's not go confusing dissent and racism. Not every comment board on the Internet has to be a place where ignorance can run rampant.

April 27, 2010 4:28 PM
Ellen said...

Sorry, I think my post was not worded very well... I wasn't talking about heckling for being American; I meant the public sexual harrassment that seems almost condoned in some places, both within the US and without.
Anyway... Down with the patriarchy? <.<

April 27, 2010 4:31 PM
The Rejectionist said...

Probably if we were open to "dissent" our blog would be called something other than THE REJECTIONIST.

Thanks for clarifying, Ellen!

HUZZAH CHERIE

April 27, 2010 4:36 PM
Colin said...

Amy,
If someone is being investigated for a crime, we could already ascertain their immigration status as part of routine process. The new law isn't necessary for that.

Also, you don't Magoo your way accross drug dealers and gun- runners by rounding up the day laborers sitting outside a Home Depot.

Overwhelmingly, the poeple who are likely to be detained as a result of this particular law are not the ones we should be worrying about. The evidence just doesn't back it up.

You don't hunt ants with a bazooka, and vague laws don't make up for good police work. I think the money it will take to enforce this law (millions of dollars statewide) would be slightly better spent on improving our (dead last) education system. Call me crazy, but maybe then the next generation of lawmakers could pass a law that addresses the more legitmate concerns involved with illegal immigration.

April 27, 2010 6:20 PM
Kelly said...

Awesome post and thanks for the links!

April 27, 2010 6:56 PM
The Rejectionist said...

Or what Colin said, if you were looking for a thoughtful and informed opinion with no cussing.

HOWEVER our post was meant to be about the awesomeness of bloggers Neesha and Annaham, and not a debate on immigration, which is why there is only one line about a law we hate in the midst of many other paragraphs. So please keep that in mind, lovely Author-friends.

April 27, 2010 6:56 PM
Laurel said...

@ Colin: Srsly? Y'all are number 50in education? WHOOP! I though for sure it was us.

Oh. and. Stop yelling at each other and be nice! It makes me sad when y'all fight plus it scares the kids.

Bring the happy back so I can stop feeling like that kitten from Le R's Rejectionist's Rejection post.

April 27, 2010 7:26 PM
K@ said...

"Both Annaham and Neesha point out that this kind of harassment gets dismissed all the time: it's just high school, it's just "illegal" "aliens" which is clearly not the same thing as actual human beings..."

This was my favorite part of your rant. You might have heard my whoop of agreement from across the entirety of the United States and the Pacific Ocean, as I live in Japan.

April 28, 2010 5:17 AM
coldfirewriter said...

People who dismiss bullying as "just high school" better start running before I get all high school on their faces.

*deep breath*

Bullying is no laughing matter. Anything that makes me feel like punching someone is no laughing matter. Bullies can go die in a hole by getting the crap beaten out of them by other bullies. And then falling into a hole to die.

Colour, sexual orientation, disabilities, gender, et cetera don't give people an excuse to treat their fellow human beings badly.

Now, rereading my comment has reminded me that I should clear a spot in my schedule for kickboxing lessons...

April 28, 2010 6:43 AM
Loretta Ross said...

I quit a job after 12+ years because my boss was a bully and he finally pushed me beyond the point of endurance. For years before I left I and the guy just above me had been trying to protect the people under us from this guy. We'd gone to *his* superior just a ridiculous number of times about him, but we just got dismissed as whiners.

It's taken me years to get past the damage that being bullied did to me. The bully, meanwhile, has since gotten a raise and a promotion. I try to have faith, though, that kharma will eventually catch up.

April 30, 2010 4:15 AM
Post a Comment